Michelle Obama Endorses the States Monopoly on Violence in a Message to Chicago: Of course there is the alternate collectivist narrative in which Stefan Molyneux correctly observers: That if a person claims they are non-violent and are for “gun control” they are not truly anti-gun nor are they non-violent people - because the reality is that guns and violence will be needed to disarm innocent law abiding people.
Those people who claim they are anti-gun and anti-violence who claim to support “gun control” will need the credible threat of police violence and the police’s guns to take away other people’s guns should they resist the attempt to centralize violence.
So those who claim to be anti-gun and anti-violence are really very pro-gun and very pro-violence. They ultimately believe that only government officials (which are of course portrayed as reliable, honest, moral, and virtuous) should be allowed to have guns. This obviously flies in the face of reality as the 20th century’s genocides at the hands of government has proven once and for all.
It’s important to note that those who advocate this type of centralized monopoly of violence do so as cowards, because it’s not their lives on the line, rather they advocate others using violence on their behalf in order to force their misguided views on innocents.
There is no such thing as gun control, there is only centralizing gun ownership in the hands of a small, political class and the forces they control, which as recent history has proven a murderous nightmare for the peace loving, disenfranchised, and disarmed citizenry.
A typical collectivist rational with lethal consequences.
(Via.) chicagotribune.com
Recent Comments